- 155 DECODER LOGICWORKS HOW TO
- 155 DECODER LOGICWORKS DRIVERS
- 155 DECODER LOGICWORKS FULL
- 155 DECODER LOGICWORKS WINDOWS 10
- 155 DECODER LOGICWORKS SOFTWARE
I don't think we are far away from this day, though. Now, first of all, as you can see there is no VP9 device decoder yet, so there is no HW acceleration for VP9 using DXVA2 decoders.Īlso, Chrome can't use VP9 acceleration for Youtube as of today with a Polaris card. The screenshot of DXVA Checker v3.14 is this: I also used MPC-HC v1.7.10.269 but with latest LAV Video v0.68.1-53 for playback. Latest LAV Video 0.68.1-53 (actually I just saw there is LAV Video v0.69 released today, but with no difference than v0.68.1-53) and DXVA Checker v3.14 I used for a few hours a Sapphire Nitro+ RX 470 with 8GB VRAM testing video decoding performance and compatibility issues.
155 DECODER LOGICWORKS HOW TO
The whole ReLive thing Hype is crazy nothing is really new it's just nice progress for AMDs Driver but it's nothing to go Crazy about other then Marketing if Reviewer really need that kind of advice that AMD is giving them how to test things in that leaked document they should better not review anything anymore ) Nvidia will heavily need Volta first to be able to recover the loss so Paxwell is a pretty dead investment choice currently.Īnd Nvidia knows that very very well that's also why their current Paxwell release was the most panic driven ever.
155 DECODER LOGICWORKS FULL
VR is also the part where it could get overly problematic for Nvidia old Card user at least pre Paxwell in the future and where AMD will definitely shine at lower cost continuously without user getting headaches, especially in a complete AMD HSA driven Platform like ZEN/VEGA combination in 2017 when the Fusion becomes full reality in the PC mass market after Consoles ) Really Problematic it was in times of the Arbitrator tuning or introduction of G-sync though some stuff needs certainly adaption to WDDM 2.0/2.1 and new use cases such as Low Latency VR.
I can only lough about the driver issues shown for Nivida here as problematic issues )
155 DECODER LOGICWORKS WINDOWS 10
You all speaking about Windows 10 WDDM 2.0/2.1 and don't understand the difference. So if you really want to compare Windows GFX Driver in a correct way please compare them over the whole WDDM timeline since VISTA NT 6 introduction, thank you. Im testing Nvidias Driver codebase on my own and im very picky changing it once im happy with it unless it really gives me a measurable benefit in my workloads. Windows 10 is a Driver Minefield in Flux who ever uses that as a work System should be aware that some time will still go by with a lot of problems, there are also a lot of new Security stuff playing a role nobody will really tell you about and problems with different System configurations ) In terms of optimization the Arbitrator is very well optimized and tested inside Nvidias driver, they're only very specific situations when it gets problematic and that is when Compute (CUDA) and 3D tasks (OpenGL/D3D/Vulkan) pre emptively hit each other (you need shader power all brute forced trys to get performance will fail, this is how Nvidia scales Gameworks) )
Nope you see it very wrong also totally unscientifically at all you don't understand how Nvidias Driver is optimized they only have major problems under Windows 10 nothing else the other WDDM work overly perfect and you can see maybe some problems in rather useless stuff like 3D Vision and G-sync but the core Driver HEART is rock solid overall.Įspecially Nvidias Shader Compiler is still the best of the best )Īnd this has very understandable reasons Nvidia invested a lot in going above normal Driver optimization since NT 6 (and they circumvented Microsoft Decisions partly to give users a better overall experience), but lot of things changed and Windows 10 is a more massive WDDM change that overall AMD was better prepared for also because of different other business related things around a very well known Gaming Console.
155 DECODER LOGICWORKS SOFTWARE
Nvidia was famous, once upon a time, for its drivers.Īctually Nvidia is a software company more than a HW company.Īs the whole Internet says all over the planet, besides people here in this thread :), this year was one bad or probably the worst year ever for Nvidia regarding drivers.īut, what the Internet and the technical sites know when we have so wise and skilled people around this thread.
This afternoon I will get a Sapphire Nitro+ RX 470/8GB and test the Polaris HW decoder in the next few days, even in VP9 (hybrid) after Crimson's Relive activation.
155 DECODER LOGICWORKS DRIVERS
By far better drivers from AMD this year compared to Nvidia which had a lot, lot of problems.Ĭrimson Relive are extraordinary good, as I read to technical sites/ reviews.
0 kommentar(er)
